Four checks, three of them instant. Start with the score if you do not know where you stand.

The AI Visibility Score

What it checks. Whether AI systems can crawl your site, whether your content is structured so an answer can be extracted from it, whether your entity signals are clear, and the technical foundations underneath. It scores your site out of 100 across those four areas.

What your result means. Below 40 is Invisible, and something structural is blocking you. 40 to 70 is Emerging, where the foundations are partly there. Above 70 is Authority, where the technical side is working and the remaining gap is usually corroboration rather than structure.

What to fix first. Whatever the lowest sub-score is. The tool names the specific gaps.

Limits. It is a directional read of public signals from one page load. It cannot see your analytics, cannot tell whether anyone actually cites you, and cannot judge whether your content is any good.

Run the AI Visibility Score → · No sign-up for the score. Email unlocks the detailed breakdown.

The AI Schema Generator

What it does. Produces valid JSON-LD for your business: Organization (or LocalBusiness or ProfessionalService) with sameAs profile links, your services, and an FAQPage if you supply questions. One clean graph, ready to paste.

What to do with the result. Put the organisation block in the <head> of your home page, one per site. Service blocks go on the pages describing those services. The FAQ block goes only on a page that visibly carries those questions and answers.

Limits. It cannot check that your FAQ answers appear on the page, that the profile URLs you entered are real or yours, or that you chose the right entity type. It produces valid markup from what you type. Whether what you typed is true is on you.

Open the Schema Generator → · Free, ungated, no email. Runs entirely in your browser and transmits nothing.

The llms.txt Generator

What it does. Reads your public sitemap, groups your URLs into sections, and produces a formatted llms.txt draft you can finish and publish at the root of your domain.

What to do with the result. Fill in every line marked REPLACE THIS. The structure is the easy part and the tool does it. The descriptions are the useful part and they need a human who knows what each page answers.

Limits. It reads your sitemap and nothing else, so a missing or stale sitemap produces a missing or stale draft. It caches by domain for 24 hours. And llms.txt is a convention rather than a standard, so publishing one is cheap housekeeping rather than a fix for AI visibility.

Open the llms.txt Generator → · Free to run and copy. Email only if you want the file downloaded.

What the tools cannot tell you, and what a manual audit adds

All three check the conditions for citation. None of them measures citation itself.

Finding out whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude or Google AI Overviews actually name your business means running a real query set across every platform, several times, and reading who gets named instead of you. That is manual work and no automated checker does it honestly. Anything claiming to is either sampling one platform once or making it up.

A manual audit also does the parts a tool structurally cannot: judging whether your content is genuinely authoritative, working out which queries you can realistically win, and finding the third-party sources that already get cited in your category so you know where the corroboration has to come from.

The tools are the free, fast, honest version. They will tell you if something is broken. They will not tell you how to win.

What we do with the data you enter

Schema generator: nothing leaves your browser. No transmission, no storage, no logging.

AI Visibility Score and llms.txt generator: we fetch public pages from the URL you give us, server side, because browsers cannot make cross-domain requests. We do not store the contents of your site. The llms.txt generator caches its result by domain for 24 hours so a repeat run costs nothing.

Where you give us an email: it reaches us as a lead. That is the trade, and it is stated up front rather than buried. Full detail in our privacy policy.

Free Tools: Common Questions

Are these tools really free?

Yes. The AI Visibility Score gives you a score with no sign-up, and asks for an email only to unlock the detailed gap breakdown. The schema generator is free and ungated with no email at any point. The llms.txt generator is free to run and free to copy, and asks for an email only if you want the file downloaded rather than copied.

What happens to the data I enter?

The schema generator runs entirely in your browser and transmits nothing at all. The AI Visibility Score and llms.txt generator fetch public pages from the URL you give us, server side, because a browser cannot make those requests across domains. We do not store the contents of your site. Where you give us an email, it reaches us as a lead and nothing more.

What can these tools not tell me?

None of them can tell you whether AI systems actually cite you today, which competitors are named instead, or why. That needs prompts run across several platforms and interpreted, which is manual work. The tools check the conditions for citation. They do not measure citation itself.

Do I need to do these in a particular order?

Start with the AI Visibility Score, because it tells you where the gaps are. The schema generator and llms.txt generator then fix two of the specific gaps it commonly finds. Doing it the other way round means fixing things without knowing whether they were your problem.

Coming next

Two more are in build: a ChatGPT citation checker and a prompt gap finder. Both call model APIs, which costs real money per run, so they will arrive with sensible limits rather than as unlimited free tools. We would rather say that now than promise something we then have to ration.